tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post1145240870775744757..comments2023-10-22T10:09:51.765-07:00Comments on The Pastors' Pen: The Three Forms of Covenant TheologyPastor Louishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12421322668429746416noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post-49071425811869687662018-09-04T23:54:28.013-07:002018-09-04T23:54:28.013-07:00Impressive work on the essayist's part.
best-p...Impressive work on the essayist's part.<br /><a href="http://thez9.com/best-pen-cameras/" rel="nofollow">best-pen-cameras</a><br />topsellar1https://www.blogger.com/profile/17396325353723606410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post-71652074000196601692017-06-12T08:52:17.875-07:002017-06-12T08:52:17.875-07:00I made a comment the other day, but it looks like ...I made a comment the other day, but it looks like it didn't make it through. Just wanted to say thank you for taking the time to try to understand and accurately represent these views. I think the video is a helpful simple introduction.<br /><br />A couple brief notes.<br /><br />1) Not all Presbyterians believe a covenant was made in Genesis 3:15. See Berkhof, for example.<br /><br />2) There are more than 3 forms of covenant theology. Just as you see some different variations among baptists, there are different variations amongst paedobaptists. Historically, the subservient covenant view was held by those who rejected Westminster's formulation. Today, those following Meredith Kline have basically adopted the subservient covenant view (the idea that the Mosaic covenant is not the covenant of grace). It is currently being debated with the OPC GA to determine if it is a tolerable view (it is contrary to WCF).<br /><br />3) Note that link #3 is to a blog search, not to a particular post.<br /><br />Thanks again for studying the view. I look forward to discussing it more with you, Lord willing.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06795441988055422268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post-15173375263339674162017-06-06T08:35:46.746-07:002017-06-06T08:35:46.746-07:00Have you posted pt 2?Have you posted pt 2?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04369494359695717737noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post-49639600021696070862017-05-30T13:01:07.377-07:002017-05-30T13:01:07.377-07:001689 Federalism will be discussed more in depth in...1689 Federalism will be discussed more in depth in part 2 of this series which should post tomorrow some time. <br /><br />1689 confirms that all of the Mosaic law has passed away, but they return to the Decalogue, and bring it into the New Covenant, and they also affirm the tripartite division in the Mosaic law. Be sure to watch part 2 when it gets released tomorrow. Pastor Louishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12421322668429746416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post-18162550913975499582017-05-30T12:19:37.989-07:002017-05-30T12:19:37.989-07:00Good stuff. Thanks! I might have misunderstood abo...Good stuff. Thanks! I might have misunderstood about 1689 Federalism: but it sounded like are you saying that they reject BOTH the tripartite division of the law AND 1 covenant / 2 administrations? Jeff Pattonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08642888639077461893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post-53976643163101129182017-05-25T12:23:46.387-07:002017-05-25T12:23:46.387-07:00I had never heard of the 20th century Baptist view...I had never heard of the 20th century Baptist view until earlier today. It ain't a Baptist view at all!Stuart Brogdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05293983517209519257noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2181137923635382192.post-55741080017393224122017-05-24T23:37:19.261-07:002017-05-24T23:37:19.261-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14471561992331392303noreply@blogger.com